Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold vs Vivo iQOO 16
The Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (2026) runs on the Tensor G6, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 63/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 4806); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 1,951,408); the Vivo iQOO 16 is noticeably lighter (223g vs 239g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold better?
- Better portability (52/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 1951408
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 2755
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 7563
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 4806 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Lighter: 223g vs 239g
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 83/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 49/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 78/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 26 points higher (89/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (100/100 vs 83/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (99/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (78/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (90/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Tensor G6 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | 1951408 | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2755 | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 7563 | 12873 | |
| Display | 8.0" Foldable OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2076x2152 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 4806 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 155.2×150.4×5.0 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 239 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | — | $840 |
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
- Main: 48MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 10MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
- 8.0" Foldable OLED
- Resolution: 2076x2152
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
- 4806 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold by 64.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (100/100 vs 83/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (99/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (78/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (90/100 vs 49/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold by 26 points (89/100 vs 63/100).
What is the rating of the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 63/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 83/100).
Should you choose the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.