Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs Vivo iQOO 15T

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Vivo iQOO 15T (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $1099 and $499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads — 82/100 vs 74/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15T has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 5060); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15T is faster in AnTuTu (4,704,310 vs 1,672,795).

The Vivo iQOO 15T edges out the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

Performance 74
Display 86
Camera 88
Battery 57
Portability 41
Value for money 58

Vivo iQOO 15T

Performance 97
Display 99
Camera 65
Battery 75
Portability 44
Value for money 86

What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro XL better?


  • Better camera (88/100 vs 65/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 15T better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4704310 vs 1672795
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1900
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 5200
  • Bigger battery: 8000 vs 5060 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 37W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 216g vs 221g
  • Cheaper at launch: $499 vs $1099

  • Higher performance (97/100 vs 74/100)
  • Longer battery life (75/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 86/100)
  • Better portability (44/100 vs 41/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs the Vivo iQOO 15T, the Vivo iQOO 15T scores 8 points higher (82/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (97/100 vs 74/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads (88/100 vs 65/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (75/100 vs 57/100). Value score: Google Pixel 9 Pro XL — 58/100, Vivo iQOO 15T — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (97/100 vs 74/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T is a bit better (99/100 vs 86/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (88/100 vs 65/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (75/100 vs 57/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T and the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL are nearly equal (44/100 vs 41/100).

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Vivo iQOO 15T: The Vivo iQOO 15T is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Vivo iQOO 15T
Processor Google Tensor G4 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1672795 4704310
Geekbench Single 1900 3293
Geekbench Multi 5200 10243
Display 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2992x1344 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5060 mAh 8000 mAh
Charging 37W 100W
Wireless charging 23W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 160 —
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 48 MP 0 MP
Front camera 42 MP 16 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 162.8×76.6×8.5 mm —
Weight 221 g 216 g
Launch price $1099 $499

Camera comparison

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

  • Main: 50MP f/1.68
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Telephoto: 48MP
  • Front: 42MP
88
camera

Vivo iQOO 15T

  • Main: 200MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 16MP
65
camera

Display comparison

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

  • 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2992x1344
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
86
display

Vivo iQOO 15T

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

  • 5060 mAh
  • Wired: 37W
  • Wireless: 23W
57
battery

Vivo iQOO 15T

  • 8000 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
75
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and Vivo iQOO 15T, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Google Tensor G4
74/100
1672795 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15T MediaTek Dimensity 9500
82/100 +64.4%
4704310 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15T leads Google Pixel 9 Pro XL by 64.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

$1099

Vivo iQOO 15T

$499

Launch price difference: $600. Vivo iQOO 15T was $600 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (97/100 vs 74/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T is a bit better (99/100 vs 86/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (88/100 vs 65/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (75/100 vs 57/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T and the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL are nearly equal (44/100 vs 41/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Vivo iQOO 15T edges out the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Vivo iQOO 15T — 82/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads on camera score (88/100 vs 65/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Vivo iQOO 15T leads on performance (97/100 vs 74/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL over the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo iQOO 15T is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.