Google Pixel 9 vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Google Pixel 9 (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $799 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 69/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,561,427); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 143); the Google Pixel 9 is noticeably lighter (198g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 by 22 points (91/100 vs 69/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Google Pixel 9

Performance 73
Display 82
Camera 75
Battery 46
Portability 55
Value for money 52

Vivo X300 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94

What makes Google Pixel 9 better?

  • Lighter: 198g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $799 vs $950

  • Better portability (55/100 vs 39/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1561427
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1850
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 4900
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 27W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 73/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 75/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 46/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 82/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 9 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 22 points higher (91/100 vs 69/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 73/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 75/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Google Pixel 9 — 52/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 (99/100 vs 73/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 (96/100 vs 75/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 (85/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (55/100 vs 39/100).

Google Pixel 9: The Google Pixel 9 is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Google Pixel 9 Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Google Tensor G4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1561427 4247433
Geekbench Single 1850 3639
Geekbench Multi 4900 11047
Display 6.3" Actua OLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 2424x1080 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 27W 100W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 143 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2700 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP69
Dimensions 152.8×72.0×8.5 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 198 g 230 g
Launch price $799 $950

Camera comparison

Google Pixel 9

  • Main: 50MP f/1.68
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Front: 10MP
75
camera

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Google Pixel 9

  • 6.3" Actua OLED
  • Resolution: 2424x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Google Pixel 9

  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 27W
  • Wireless: 15W
46
battery

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 9 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4
69/100
1561427 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +63.2%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Google Pixel 9 by 63.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Google Pixel 9

$799

Vivo X300 Ultra

$950

Launch price difference: $151. Google Pixel 9 was $151 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 (99/100 vs 73/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 82/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 (96/100 vs 75/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 (85/100 vs 46/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (55/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 by 22 points (91/100 vs 69/100).

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Google Pixel 9 has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 75/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 73/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Google Pixel 9 is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.