Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (2025) runs on the Google Tensor G5, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $1799 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 87/100 vs 38/100 (a 49-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5015); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,553,009); the Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably lighter (230g vs 258g).
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Overall rating 38/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1553009
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 2276
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 6173
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5015 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Lighter: 230g vs 258g
- Cheaper: $950 vs $1799
- Higher performance (96/100 vs 32/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (77/100 vs 42/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (12/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (44/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 49 points higher (87/100 vs 38/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (77/100 vs 42/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (44/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (96/100 vs 32/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (96/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (77/100 vs 42/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (12/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (44/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Google Tensor G5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1553009 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2276 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6173 | 11033 | |
| Display | 8.0" Super Actua Flex LTPO OLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2152x2076 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5015 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 155.2×150.4×5.2 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 258 g | 230 g | |
| Price | $1799 | $950 |
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 10MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
- 8.0" Super Actua Flex LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 2152x2076
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
- 5015 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold by 63.4% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $849. Vivo X300 Ultra is cheaper by $849.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (96/100 vs 32/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (96/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (77/100 vs 42/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (12/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (44/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold by 49 points (87/100 vs 38/100).
What is the rating of the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 38/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 32/100).
Should you choose the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.