Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs Vivo X300s

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (2025) runs on the Google Tensor G5, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $1799 and $723. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 61/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 5015); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 1,553,009); the Vivo X300s is noticeably lighter (217g vs 258g).

The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold by 28 points (89/100 vs 61/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold

Performance 76
Display 78
Camera 37
Battery 53
Portability 52
Value for money 30

Vivo X300s

Performance 95
Display 94
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 42
Value for money 92

What makes Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold better?


  • Better portability (52/100 vs 42/100)

What makes Vivo X300s better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 1553009
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 2276
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 6173
  • Bigger battery: 7100 vs 5015 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 30W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
  • Lighter: 217g vs 258g
  • Cheaper at launch: $723 vs $1799

  • Higher performance (95/100 vs 76/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 37/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 53/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 78/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 28 points higher (89/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s leads (95/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 53/100). Value score: Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold — 30/100, Vivo X300s — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (95/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (94/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (83/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100).

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold: The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300s: The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold Vivo X300s
Processor Google Tensor G5 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1553009 3703823
Geekbench Single 2276 3293
Geekbench Multi 6173 10243
Display 8.0" Super Actua Flex LTPO OLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2152x2076 2800x1260
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5015 mAh 7100 mAh
Charging 30W 90W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
Main camera 48 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 10 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 50 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16 / OriginOS 6
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits —
NFC yes —
Protection IP68 —
Dimensions 155.2×150.4×5.2 mm —
Weight 258 g 217 g
Launch price $1799 $723

Camera comparison

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold

  • Main: 48MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 10MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
37
camera

Vivo X300s

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera

Display comparison

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold

  • 8.0" Super Actua Flex LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2152x2076
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display

Vivo X300s

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1260
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold

  • 5015 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • Wireless: 15W
53
battery

Vivo X300s

  • 7100 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
83
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold Google Tensor G5
61/100
1553009 AnTuTu
Vivo X300s Dimensity 9500
89/100 +58.1%
3703823 AnTuTu

Vivo X300s leads Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold by 58.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold

$1799

Vivo X300s

$723

Launch price difference: $1076. Vivo X300s was $1076 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (95/100 vs 76/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (94/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (94/100 vs 37/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (83/100 vs 53/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold by 28 points (89/100 vs 61/100).

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and the Vivo X300s?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 37/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s leads on performance (95/100 vs 76/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold over the Vivo X300s?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.