Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Vivo iQOO 15T

The Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (2024) runs on the Apple A18 Pro, while the Vivo iQOO 15T (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $1199 and $499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads — 82/100 vs 77/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15T has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 4685); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15T is faster in AnTuTu (4,704,310 vs 1,782,199).

The Vivo iQOO 15T edges out the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max

Performance 85
Display 85
Camera 89
Battery 47
Portability 40
Value for money 64

Vivo iQOO 15T

Performance 97
Display 99
Camera 65
Battery 75
Portability 44
Value for money 86

What makes Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max better?

  • Better Geekbench Single: 3400 vs 3293

  • Better camera (89/100 vs 65/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 15T better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4704310 vs 1782199
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 8400
  • Bigger battery: 8000 vs 4685 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 27W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 216g vs 227g
  • Cheaper at launch: $499 vs $1199

  • Higher performance (97/100 vs 85/100)
  • Longer battery life (75/100 vs 47/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 85/100)
  • Better portability (44/100 vs 40/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max vs the Vivo iQOO 15T, the Vivo iQOO 15T scores 5 points higher (82/100 vs 77/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (97/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max leads (89/100 vs 65/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (75/100 vs 47/100). Value score: Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max — 64/100, Vivo iQOO 15T — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T is a bit better (97/100 vs 85/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T is a bit better (99/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (89/100 vs 65/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (75/100 vs 47/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T and the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max are nearly equal (44/100 vs 40/100).

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max: The Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Vivo iQOO 15T: The Vivo iQOO 15T is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Vivo iQOO 15T
Processor Apple A18 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1782199 4704310
Geekbench Single 3400 3293
Geekbench Multi 8400 10243
Display 6.9" Super Retina XDR OLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2868x1320 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4685 mAh 8000 mAh
Charging 27W 100W
Wireless charging 25W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 161 —
Main camera 48 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 12 MP 0 MP
Front camera 12 MP 16 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS iOS 18 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2000 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 163.0×77.6×8.3 mm —
Weight 227 g 216 g
Launch price $1199 $499

Camera comparison

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max

  • Main: 48MP f/1.78
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Telephoto: 12MP
  • Front: 12MP
89
camera

Vivo iQOO 15T

  • Main: 200MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 16MP
65
camera

Display comparison

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max

  • 6.9" Super Retina XDR OLED
  • Resolution: 2868x1320
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display

Vivo iQOO 15T

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max

  • 4685 mAh
  • Wired: 27W
  • Wireless: 25W
47
battery

Vivo iQOO 15T

  • 8000 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
75
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max and Vivo iQOO 15T, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Apple A18 Pro
77/100
1782199 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15T MediaTek Dimensity 9500
82/100 +62.1%
4704310 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15T leads Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max by 62.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max

$1199

Vivo iQOO 15T

$499

Launch price difference: $700. Vivo iQOO 15T was $700 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T is a bit better (97/100 vs 85/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T is a bit better (99/100 vs 85/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (89/100 vs 65/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (75/100 vs 47/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T and the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max are nearly equal (44/100 vs 40/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max or the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Vivo iQOO 15T edges out the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max and the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Vivo iQOO 15T — 82/100.

Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max or the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max leads on camera score (89/100 vs 65/100).

Which is more powerful: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max or the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Vivo iQOO 15T leads on performance (97/100 vs 85/100).

Should you choose the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max over the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo iQOO 15T is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.