Vivo X300 Pro vs ZTE Blade A52 Lite
Comparing the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) and the ZTE Blade A52 Lite (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 27/100 (a 60-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 13 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE Blade A52 Lite doesn't; the ZTE Blade A52 Lite is noticeably lighter (188g vs 226g).
Vivo X300 Pro
ZTE Blade A52 Lite
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 32/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 39/100)
- Lighter: 188g vs 226g
- Better portability (60/100 vs 43/100)
Comparing the Vivo X300 Pro vs the ZTE Blade A52 Lite, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 60 points higher (87/100 vs 27/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 32/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 Lite (84/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 Lite (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 Lite (81/100 vs 32/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade A52 Lite notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (60/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Vivo X300 Pro | ZTE Blade A52 Lite | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 9500 | — | |
| AnTuTu | 3269794 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3228 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9553 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 6510 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | — | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 171 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 2GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 32GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 11 (Go edition) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | 164.8×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 226 g | 188 g | |
| Launch price | $899 | — |
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
ZTE Blade A52 Lite
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Blade A52 Lite
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
ZTE Blade A52 Lite
- 4000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
ZTE Blade A52 Lite
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 Lite (84/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 Lite (96/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 Lite (81/100 vs 32/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade A52 Lite notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (60/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Pro or the ZTE Blade A52 Lite?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 Lite by 60 points (87/100 vs 27/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Pro and the ZTE Blade A52 Lite?
The Vivo X300 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the ZTE Blade A52 Lite — 27/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Pro or the ZTE Blade A52 Lite?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Pro over the ZTE Blade A52 Lite?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Blade A52 Lite is a better fit for everyday use.