Vivo iQOO 13 vs ZTE Blade A52 Lite
Comparing the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) and the ZTE Blade A52 Lite (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 27/100 (a 57-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Vivo iQOO 13 has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE Blade A52 Lite doesn't; the ZTE Blade A52 Lite is noticeably lighter (188g vs 207g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo iQOO 13
ZTE Blade A52 Lite
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
- Bigger battery: 6150 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (78/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 32/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 39/100)
What makes ZTE Blade A52 Lite better?
- Lighter: 188g vs 207g
- Better portability (60/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo iQOO 13 vs the ZTE Blade A52 Lite, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 57 points higher (84/100 vs 27/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 32/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 Lite (99/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 Lite (78/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 Lite (73/100 vs 32/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade A52 Lite is a bit better (60/100 vs 55/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo iQOO 13 | ZTE Blade A52 Lite | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | — | |
| AnTuTu | 3150555 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1440x3168 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 6150 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 2GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 32GB | |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | Android 11 (Go edition) | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | 164.8×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 207 g | 188 g | |
| Launch price | $650 | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
ZTE Blade A52 Lite
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Display comparison
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
ZTE Blade A52 Lite
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A52 Lite
- 4000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
ZTE Blade A52 Lite
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 Lite (99/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 Lite (78/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 Lite (73/100 vs 32/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade A52 Lite is a bit better (60/100 vs 55/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO 13 or the ZTE Blade A52 Lite?
The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 Lite by 57 points (84/100 vs 27/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO 13 and the ZTE Blade A52 Lite?
The Vivo iQOO 13 has a MobileRank rating of 84/100, the ZTE Blade A52 Lite — 27/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO 13 or the ZTE Blade A52 Lite?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO 13 over the ZTE Blade A52 Lite?
The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.