Vivo X300 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 11

The Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500, while the Xiaomi Mi 11 (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888; launch prices were $899 and $500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 61/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 200 MP vs 108 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 1,098,795); the Xiaomi Mi 11 is noticeably lighter (196g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi 11 by 26 points (87/100 vs 61/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
Xiaomi Mi 11
Performance 63
Display 89
Camera 48
Battery 57
Portability 60
Value for money 48
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 1098795
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1488
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 3373
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4600 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 55W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 63/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 48/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better value for money (86/100 vs 48/100)
What makes Xiaomi Mi 11 better?
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
  • Lighter: 196g vs 226g
  • Cheaper at launch: $500 vs $899

  • Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better portability (60/100 vs 43/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo X300 Pro vs the Xiaomi Mi 11, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 26 points higher (87/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 63/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 57/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (86/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi 11 (93/100 vs 63/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi Mi 11 is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi 11 (96/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi Mi 11 (81/100 vs 57/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi Mi 11 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (60/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi 11 (86/100 vs 48/100).

Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Xiaomi Mi 11: The Xiaomi Mi 11 is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Vivo X300 Pro Xiaomi Mi 11
Processor Dimensity 9500 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
AnTuTu 3269794 1098795
Geekbench Single 3228 1488
Geekbench Multi 9553 3373
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1260x2800 3200x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6510 mAh 4600 mAh
Charging 90W 55W
Wireless charging 40W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 171
Main camera 200 MP 108 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 13 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 20 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 Android 11
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 1500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm 164.3×74.6×8.1 mm
Weight 226 g 196 g
Launch price $899 $500
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Xiaomi Mi 11
  • Main: 108MP f/1.85
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 20MP
48
camera
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Xiaomi Mi 11
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Xiaomi Mi 11
  • 4600 mAh
  • Wired: 55W
  • Wireless: 50W
57
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Vivo X300 Pro and Xiaomi Mi 11, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100
3269794 AnTuTu
Xiaomi Mi 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
61/100 -197.6%
1098795 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Xiaomi Mi 11 by 197.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo X300 Pro
$899
Xiaomi Mi 11
$500

Launch price difference: $399. Xiaomi Mi 11 was $399 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi 11 (93/100 vs 63/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Xiaomi Mi 11 is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi 11 (96/100 vs 48/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi Mi 11 (81/100 vs 57/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi Mi 11 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (60/100 vs 43/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi 11 (86/100 vs 48/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Pro or the Xiaomi Mi 11?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi 11 by 26 points (87/100 vs 61/100).

What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi Mi 11?

The Vivo X300 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Xiaomi Mi 11 — 61/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Pro or the Xiaomi Mi 11?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 48/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 Pro or the Xiaomi Mi 11?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 63/100).

Should you choose the Vivo X300 Pro over the Xiaomi Mi 11?

The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi Mi 11 is a better fit for active users.