Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra vs Xiaomi Mi 11

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Xiaomi Mi 11 (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888; launch prices were $799 and $500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 62/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 1,102,627); the Xiaomi Mi 11 is noticeably lighter (196g vs 227g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi 11 by 27 points (89/100 vs 62/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 92
Portability 35
Value for money 92

Xiaomi Mi 11

Performance 64
Display 89
Camera 48
Battery 57
Portability 60
Value for money 46

What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 1102627
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1500
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 3537
  • Bigger battery: 7400 vs 4600 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 55W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 64/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 48/100)
  • Longer battery life (92/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 89/100)

What makes Xiaomi Mi 11 better?

  • Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 196g vs 227g
  • Cheaper at launch: $500 vs $799

  • Better portability (60/100 vs 35/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra vs the Xiaomi Mi 11, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 27 points higher (89/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 57/100). Value score: Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 92/100, Xiaomi Mi 11 — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi 11 (99/100 vs 64/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi 11 (78/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi 11 (92/100 vs 57/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi Mi 11 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (60/100 vs 35/100).

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Xiaomi Mi 11: The Xiaomi Mi 11 is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Xiaomi Mi 11
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
AnTuTu 4602290 1102627
Geekbench Single 3639 1500
Geekbench Multi 11047 3537
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1440x3168 3200x1440
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7400 mAh 4600 mAh
Charging 120W 55W
Wireless charging 50W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 108 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 13 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 20 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB / 24GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 Android 11
Brightness (peak) 8000 nits 1500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 —
Dimensions 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm 164.3×74.6×8.1 mm
Weight 227 g 196 g
Launch price $799 $500

Camera comparison

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Xiaomi Mi 11

  • Main: 108MP f/1.85
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 20MP
48
camera

Display comparison

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Xiaomi Mi 11

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 7400 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
92
battery

Xiaomi Mi 11

  • 4600 mAh
  • Wired: 55W
  • Wireless: 50W
57
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra and Xiaomi Mi 11, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100
4602290 AnTuTu
Xiaomi Mi 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
62/100 -317.4%
1102627 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Xiaomi Mi 11 by 317.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

$799

Xiaomi Mi 11

$500

Launch price difference: $299. Xiaomi Mi 11 was $299 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi 11 (99/100 vs 64/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi 11 (78/100 vs 48/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi 11 (92/100 vs 57/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi Mi 11 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (60/100 vs 35/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra or the Xiaomi Mi 11?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi 11 by 27 points (89/100 vs 62/100).

What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra and the Xiaomi Mi 11?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 89/100, the Xiaomi Mi 11 — 62/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra or the Xiaomi Mi 11?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 48/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra or the Xiaomi Mi 11?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 64/100).

Should you choose the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra over the Xiaomi Mi 11?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi Mi 11 is a better fit for active users.