Vivo X300 Pro vs Xiaomi 14T Pro
The Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500, while the Xiaomi 14T Pro (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; launch prices were $899 and $649. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 78/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 2,129,644); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 135); the Xiaomi 14T Pro is noticeably lighter (209g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Pro
Xiaomi 14T Pro
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 2129644
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 2249
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 7352
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 82/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 69/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 79/100)
What makes Xiaomi 14T Pro better?
- Faster charging: 120W vs 90W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 209g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $649 vs $899
- Better display (93/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (49/100 vs 43/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X300 Pro vs the Xiaomi 14T Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 10 points higher (88/100 vs 78/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 69/100). Value score: Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100, Xiaomi 14T Pro — 70/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 14T Pro is a bit better (93/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 14T Pro (96/100 vs 69/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 14T Pro are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 14T Pro is a bit better (49/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X300 Pro | Xiaomi 14T Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 9500 | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | |
| AnTuTu | 3326259 | 2129644 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3293 | 2249 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10243 | 7352 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 2712x1220 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 6510 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 171 | 135 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 4000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | 160.4×75.1×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 226 g | 209 g | |
| Launch price | $899 | $649 |
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi 14T Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 14T Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2712x1220
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Xiaomi 14T Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo X300 Pro and Xiaomi 14T Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Xiaomi 14T Pro by 56.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $250. Xiaomi 14T Pro was $250 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 14T Pro is a bit better (93/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 14T Pro (96/100 vs 69/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 14T Pro are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 14T Pro is a bit better (49/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Pro or the Xiaomi 14T Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Xiaomi 14T Pro — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 14T Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 88/100, the Xiaomi 14T Pro — 78/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Pro or the Xiaomi 14T Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 69/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 Pro or the Xiaomi 14T Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Pro over the Xiaomi 14T Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 14T Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.