Vivo iQOO 16 vs Xiaomi 14T Pro
The Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6, while the Xiaomi 14T Pro (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; launch prices were $840 and $649. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 78/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 2,129,644).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo iQOO 16
Xiaomi 14T Pro
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 2129644
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 2249
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 7352
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 5000 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 144Hz
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 82/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 69/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 79/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 93/100)
What makes Xiaomi 14T Pro better?
- Faster charging: 120W vs 100W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 209g vs 223g
- Cheaper at launch: $649 vs $840
- Better portability (49/100 vs 42/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo iQOO 16 vs the Xiaomi 14T Pro, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 11 points higher (89/100 vs 78/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 82/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 79/100). Value score: Vivo iQOO 16 — 92/100, Xiaomi 14T Pro — 70/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Xiaomi 14T Pro (100/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (99/100 vs 93/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (78/100 vs 69/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (90/100 vs 79/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 14T Pro is a bit better (49/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo iQOO 16 | Xiaomi 14T Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | |
| AnTuTu | 5498720 | 2129644 | |
| Geekbench Single | 4327 | 2249 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 12873 | 7352 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1440x3168 | 2712x1220 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 8400 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 135 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | 4000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | 160.4×75.1×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 223 g | 209 g | |
| Launch price | $840 | $649 |
Camera comparison
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi 14T Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Xiaomi 14T Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2712x1220
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Xiaomi 14T Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo iQOO 16 and Xiaomi 14T Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads Xiaomi 14T Pro by 158.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $191. Xiaomi 14T Pro was $191 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Xiaomi 14T Pro (100/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (99/100 vs 93/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (78/100 vs 69/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (90/100 vs 79/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 14T Pro is a bit better (49/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO 16 or the Xiaomi 14T Pro?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is noticeably better than the Xiaomi 14T Pro — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO 16 and the Xiaomi 14T Pro?
The Vivo iQOO 16 has a MobileRank rating of 89/100, the Xiaomi 14T Pro — 78/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO 16 or the Xiaomi 14T Pro?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 69/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo iQOO 16 or the Xiaomi 14T Pro?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO 16 over the Xiaomi 14T Pro?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 14T Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.