Tecno Camon 40 Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Tecno Camon 40 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 64/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 910,112); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 138); the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is noticeably lighter (179g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Tecno Camon 40 Pro better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 179g vs 226g
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (79/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 910112
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 2813
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5200 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 71/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 53/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon 40 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 24 points higher (88/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 71/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (94/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (96/100 vs 71/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (81/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (79/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 40 Pro | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 910112 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 138 | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.3×74.6×7.3 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 179 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Camon 40 Pro and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Tecno Camon 40 Pro by 72.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (94/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (96/100 vs 71/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (81/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (79/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 40 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro by 24 points (88/100 vs 64/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 40 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Tecno Camon 40 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 40 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 71/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 40 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 40 Pro over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.