Tecno Camon 40 Pro vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
The Tecno Camon 40 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500M. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads — 75/100 vs 64/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has the bigger battery (9100 mAh vs 5200); the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,579,952 vs 910,112); the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is noticeably lighter (179g vs 225g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
What makes Tecno Camon 40 Pro better?
- Lighter: 179g vs 225g
- Better camera (71/100 vs 35/100)
- Better portability (79/100 vs 38/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3579952 vs 910112
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 2813
- Bigger battery: 9100 vs 5200 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 55/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 89/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon 40 Pro vs the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra scores 11 points higher (75/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (95/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro leads (71/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (95/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (71/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (80/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (79/100 vs 38/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 40 Pro | Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500M | |
| AnTuTu | 910112 | 3579952 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPS AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 | 1440x3200 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 9100 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 138 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 164.3×74.6×7.3 mm | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 179 g | 225 g | |
| Launch price | — | $548 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3200
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 9100 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Camon 40 Pro and Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads Tecno Camon 40 Pro by 74.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (95/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (71/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (80/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (79/100 vs 38/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 40 Pro or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is noticeably better than the Tecno Camon 40 Pro — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 40 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Tecno Camon 40 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 40 Pro or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Tecno Camon 40 Pro leads on camera score (71/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 40 Pro or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads on performance (95/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 40 Pro over the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.