Tecno Camon 40 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Tecno Camon 40 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 64/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 902,765); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 138); the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is noticeably lighter (179g vs 230g).
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 179g vs 230g
- Better portability (79/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 902765
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2813
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5200 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 71/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 53/100)
Comparing the Tecno Camon 40 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 27 points higher (91/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 71/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 89/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (96/100 vs 71/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (85/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (79/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Tecno Camon 40 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 902765 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 138 | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HIOS 15 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 164.3×74.6×7.3 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 179 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Tecno Camon 40 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Tecno Camon 40 Pro by 78.7% in our overall performance rating.
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (99/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 89/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (96/100 vs 71/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (85/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (79/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 40 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro by 27 points (91/100 vs 64/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 40 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Tecno Camon 40 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 40 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 71/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 40 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 40 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Tecno Camon 40 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.