Tecno Camon 40 Pro vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
The Tecno Camon 40 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 64/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 5200); the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 910,112); the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is noticeably lighter (179g vs 227g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
What makes Tecno Camon 40 Pro better?
- Lighter: 179g vs 227g
- Better portability (79/100 vs 35/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 910112
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2813
- Bigger battery: 7400 vs 5200 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 45W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 71/100)
- Longer battery life (92/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 89/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon 40 Pro vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 25 points higher (89/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (78/100 vs 71/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (92/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (79/100 vs 35/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 40 Pro | Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 910112 | 4602290 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 7400 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 138 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB / 24GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 8000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.3×74.6×7.3 mm | 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 179 g | 227 g | |
| Launch price | — | $799 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 7400 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Camon 40 Pro and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Tecno Camon 40 Pro by 80.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (99/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (78/100 vs 71/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (92/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (79/100 vs 35/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 40 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro by 25 points (89/100 vs 64/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 40 Pro and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Tecno Camon 40 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 40 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 71/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 40 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 40 Pro over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.