Tecno Camon 40 Pro vs Vivo V40e
The Tecno Camon 40 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate, while the Vivo V40e (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro leads — 58/100 vs 57/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo V40e has the bigger battery (5500 mAh vs 5200); the Tecno Camon 40 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo V40e doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
Vivo V40e
What makes Tecno Camon 40 Pro better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 179g vs 183g
- Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (79/100 vs 74/100)
What makes Vivo V40e better?
- Bigger battery: 5500 vs 5200 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Longer battery life (62/100 vs 53/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon 40 Pro vs the Vivo V40e, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro scores 1 points higher (58/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100. In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 44/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo V40e is a bit better (62/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is a bit better (79/100 vs 74/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 40 Pro | Vivo V40e | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | |
| AnTuTu | 879714 | 879714 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1001 | 1001 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2918 | 2918 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 | 1080x2392 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 5500 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 164.3×74.6×7.3 mm | 163.7×75.0×7.5 mm | |
| Weight | 179 g | 183 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo V40e
- Main: 50MP f/2.0
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo V40e
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo V40e
- 5500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Camon 40 Pro and Vivo V40e, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 44/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo V40e is a bit better (62/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is a bit better (79/100 vs 74/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 40 Pro or the Vivo V40e?
The Tecno Camon 40 Pro edges out the Vivo V40e by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 40 Pro and the Vivo V40e?
The Tecno Camon 40 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the Vivo V40e — 57/100.
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 40 Pro over the Vivo V40e?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is display — better on the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (89/100 vs 79/100).