Sharp Aquos wish6 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Sharp Aquos wish6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 44/100 (a 44-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 528,398); the Sharp Aquos wish6 is noticeably lighter (189g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Sharp Aquos wish6
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Sharp Aquos wish6 better?
- Lighter: 189g vs 226g
- Better portability (62/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 528398
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 1980
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 56/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Sharp Aquos wish6 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 44 points higher (88/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos wish6 (94/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos wish6 (84/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos wish6 (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos wish6 (81/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos wish6 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (62/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Sharp Aquos wish6 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 528398 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 771 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1980 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1612 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 165.0×76.0×8.3 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Camera comparison
Sharp Aquos wish6
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Sharp Aquos wish6
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Sharp Aquos wish6
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Sharp Aquos wish6 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Sharp Aquos wish6 by 84.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Sharp Aquos wish6
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos wish6 (94/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos wish6 (84/100 vs 56/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos wish6 (96/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos wish6 (81/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos wish6 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (62/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Sharp Aquos wish6 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos wish6 by 44 points (88/100 vs 44/100).
What is the rating of the Sharp Aquos wish6 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Sharp Aquos wish6 has a MobileRank rating of 44/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Sharp Aquos wish6 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Sharp Aquos wish6 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Sharp Aquos wish6 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.