Sharp Aquos Wish4 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Sharp Aquos Wish4 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 700, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 40/100 (a 51-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 515,647); the Sharp Aquos Wish4 is noticeably lighter (190g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Sharp Aquos Wish4
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Sharp Aquos Wish4 better?
- Lighter: 190g vs 230g
- Better portability (56/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 515647
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 690
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 1736
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 40/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 44/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Sharp Aquos Wish4 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 51 points higher (91/100 vs 40/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 40/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos Wish4 (99/100 vs 40/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos Wish4 (89/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos Wish4 (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos Wish4 (85/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos Wish4 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (56/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Sharp Aquos Wish4 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 700 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 515647 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 690 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1736 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1612 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 167.0×76.0×8.8 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Sharp Aquos Wish4
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Sharp Aquos Wish4
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Sharp Aquos Wish4
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Sharp Aquos Wish4 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Sharp Aquos Wish4 by 87.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Sharp Aquos Wish4
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos Wish4 (99/100 vs 40/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos Wish4 (89/100 vs 44/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos Wish4 (96/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos Wish4 (85/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos Wish4 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (56/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Sharp Aquos Wish4 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos Wish4 by 51 points (91/100 vs 40/100).
What is the rating of the Sharp Aquos Wish4 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Sharp Aquos Wish4 has a MobileRank rating of 40/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Sharp Aquos Wish4 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Sharp Aquos Wish4 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 40/100).
Should you choose the Sharp Aquos Wish4 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.