Sharp Aquos Wish4 vs Vivo iQOO 16
The Sharp Aquos Wish4 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 700, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 40/100 (a 49-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 515,647); the Sharp Aquos Wish4 is noticeably lighter (190g vs 223g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Sharp Aquos Wish4
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes Sharp Aquos Wish4 better?
- Lighter: 190g vs 223g
- Better portability (56/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 515647
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 690
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 1736
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 5000 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 40/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 44/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Sharp Aquos Wish4 vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 49 points higher (89/100 vs 40/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 40/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos Wish4 (100/100 vs 40/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos Wish4 (99/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos Wish4 (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos Wish4 (90/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos Wish4 is a bit better (56/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Sharp Aquos Wish4 | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 700 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | 515647 | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 690 | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1736 | 12873 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1612 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 167.0×76.0×8.8 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | — | $840 |
Camera comparison
Sharp Aquos Wish4
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Sharp Aquos Wish4
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Sharp Aquos Wish4
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Sharp Aquos Wish4 and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads Sharp Aquos Wish4 by 90.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Sharp Aquos Wish4
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos Wish4 (100/100 vs 40/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos Wish4 (99/100 vs 44/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos Wish4 (78/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos Wish4 (90/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos Wish4 is a bit better (56/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Sharp Aquos Wish4 or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos Wish4 by 49 points (89/100 vs 40/100).
What is the rating of the Sharp Aquos Wish4 and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Sharp Aquos Wish4 has a MobileRank rating of 40/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Sharp Aquos Wish4 or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Sharp Aquos Wish4 or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 40/100).
Should you choose the Sharp Aquos Wish4 over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.