Samsung W22 5G vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Samsung W22 5G (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 48/100 (a 40-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 1,135,878); the Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably lighter (226g vs 271g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung W22 5G
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Samsung W22 5G better?
- Overall rating 48/100
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 1135878
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1500
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 3537
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4400 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Lighter: 226g vs 271g
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 64/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 21/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 38/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (43/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung W22 5G vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 40 points higher (88/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 21/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 38/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (94/100 vs 64/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (96/100 vs 21/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (81/100 vs 38/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (43/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung W22 5G | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 1135878 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1500 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3537 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.2" Super Amoled | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 832x2268 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4400 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | — | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 16GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX8 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 158.2×67.1×14.4 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 271 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Camera comparison
Samsung W22 5G
- Main: 12MP
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung W22 5G
- 6.2" Super Amoled
- Resolution: 832x2268
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung W22 5G
- 4400 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung W22 5G and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung W22 5G by 65.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung W22 5G
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (94/100 vs 64/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (96/100 vs 21/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (81/100 vs 38/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (43/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung W22 5G or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G by 40 points (88/100 vs 48/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung W22 5G and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung W22 5G has a MobileRank rating of 48/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung W22 5G or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 21/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung W22 5G or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 64/100).
Should you choose the Samsung W22 5G over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung W22 5G is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.