Samsung W22 5G vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
The Samsung W22 5G (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 48/100 (a 41-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 1,135,878); the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is noticeably lighter (227g vs 271g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung W22 5G
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
What makes Samsung W22 5G better?
- Overall rating 48/100
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 1135878
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1500
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 3537
- Bigger battery: 7400 vs 4400 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Lighter: 227g vs 271g
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 64/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 21/100)
- Longer battery life (92/100 vs 38/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (35/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung W22 5G vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 41 points higher (89/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 21/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 38/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (99/100 vs 64/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (99/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (78/100 vs 21/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (92/100 vs 38/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (35/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung W22 5G | Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1135878 | 4602290 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1500 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3537 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.2" Super Amoled | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 832x2268 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4400 mAh | 7400 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | — | 12GB / 16GB / 24GB | |
| Storage | 16GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 8000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX8 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 158.2×67.1×14.4 mm | 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 271 g | 227 g | |
| Launch price | — | $799 |
Camera comparison
Samsung W22 5G
- Main: 12MP
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung W22 5G
- 6.2" Super Amoled
- Resolution: 832x2268
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung W22 5G
- 4400 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 7400 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung W22 5G and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Samsung W22 5G by 75.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung W22 5G
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (99/100 vs 64/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (99/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (78/100 vs 21/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (92/100 vs 38/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (35/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung W22 5G or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G by 41 points (89/100 vs 48/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung W22 5G and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Samsung W22 5G has a MobileRank rating of 48/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung W22 5G or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 21/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung W22 5G or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 64/100).
Should you choose the Samsung W22 5G over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Samsung W22 5G is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.