Samsung W22 5G vs Vivo iQOO 16
The Samsung W22 5G (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 48/100 (a 41-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 1,135,878); the Vivo iQOO 16 is noticeably lighter (223g vs 271g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung W22 5G
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes Samsung W22 5G better?
- Overall rating 48/100
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 1135878
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 1500
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 3537
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 4400 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Lighter: 223g vs 271g
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 64/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 21/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 38/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (42/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung W22 5G vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 41 points higher (89/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 21/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 38/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (100/100 vs 64/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (99/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (78/100 vs 21/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (90/100 vs 38/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (42/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung W22 5G | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | 1135878 | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1500 | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3537 | 12873 | |
| Display | 6.2" Super Amoled | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 832x2268 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 4400 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | — | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 16GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX8 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 158.2×67.1×14.4 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 271 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | — | $840 |
Camera comparison
Samsung W22 5G
- Main: 12MP
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung W22 5G
- 6.2" Super Amoled
- Resolution: 832x2268
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung W22 5G
- 4400 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung W22 5G and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads Samsung W22 5G by 79.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung W22 5G
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (100/100 vs 64/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (99/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (78/100 vs 21/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (90/100 vs 38/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (42/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung W22 5G or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G by 41 points (89/100 vs 48/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung W22 5G and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Samsung W22 5G has a MobileRank rating of 48/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung W22 5G or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 21/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung W22 5G or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 64/100).
Should you choose the Samsung W22 5G over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Samsung W22 5G is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.