Samsung W22 5G vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Samsung W22 5G (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 48/100 (a 43-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,135,878); the Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably lighter (230g vs 271g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung W22 5G
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Samsung W22 5G better?
- Overall rating 48/100
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1135878
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1500
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 3537
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4400 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Lighter: 230g vs 271g
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 64/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 21/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 38/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (39/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung W22 5G vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 43 points higher (91/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 21/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 38/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (99/100 vs 64/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (96/100 vs 21/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (85/100 vs 38/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (39/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung W22 5G | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1135878 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1500 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3537 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.2" Super Amoled | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 832x2268 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4400 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | — | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 16GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX8 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 158.2×67.1×14.4 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 271 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Samsung W22 5G
- Main: 12MP
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung W22 5G
- 6.2" Super Amoled
- Resolution: 832x2268
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung W22 5G
- 4400 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung W22 5G and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung W22 5G by 73.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung W22 5G
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (99/100 vs 64/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (96/100 vs 21/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (85/100 vs 38/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (39/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung W22 5G or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G by 43 points (91/100 vs 48/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung W22 5G and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung W22 5G has a MobileRank rating of 48/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung W22 5G or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 21/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung W22 5G or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 64/100).
Should you choose the Samsung W22 5G over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung W22 5G is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.