Samsung W22 5G vs Vivo iQOO 13
The Samsung W22 5G (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 48/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,150,555 vs 1,135,878); the Vivo iQOO 13 is noticeably lighter (207g vs 271g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung W22 5G
Vivo iQOO 13
What makes Samsung W22 5G better?
- Overall rating 48/100
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3150555 vs 1135878
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1500
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3537
- Bigger battery: 6150 vs 4400 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 207g vs 271g
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 64/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 21/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 38/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung W22 5G vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 36 points higher (84/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (91/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 21/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 38/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (91/100 vs 64/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (99/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (78/100 vs 21/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (73/100 vs 38/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (55/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung W22 5G | Vivo iQOO 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1135878 | 3150555 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1500 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3537 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.2" Super Amoled | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 832x2268 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4400 mAh | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | — | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 16GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX8 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 158.2×67.1×14.4 mm | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 271 g | 207 g | |
| Launch price | — | $650 |
Camera comparison
Samsung W22 5G
- Main: 12MP
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung W22 5G
- 6.2" Super Amoled
- Resolution: 832x2268
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung W22 5G
- 4400 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung W22 5G and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 13 leads Samsung W22 5G by 63.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung W22 5G
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (91/100 vs 64/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (99/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (78/100 vs 21/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (73/100 vs 38/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (55/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung W22 5G or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G by 36 points (84/100 vs 48/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung W22 5G and the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Samsung W22 5G has a MobileRank rating of 48/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung W22 5G or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 21/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung W22 5G or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (91/100 vs 64/100).
Should you choose the Samsung W22 5G over the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Samsung W22 5G is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.