Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Tecno Pova 7 Neo
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Tecno Pova 7 Neo (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate; estimated prices are $2899 and $140. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 30/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova 7 Neo has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 200 MP vs 108 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 560,883); the Tecno Pova 7 Neo is noticeably lighter (210g vs 309g).
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Tecno Pova 7 Neo
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 560883
- Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 760
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 1890
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (67/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (49/100 vs 35/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5600 mAh
- Lighter: 210g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $140 vs $2899
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 52/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (37/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Tecno Pova 7 Neo, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 27 points higher (57/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (49/100 vs 35/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Neo leads (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Neo (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Neo (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (49/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Neo and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (56/100 vs 52/100). In the "design" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Neo significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (37/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Neo significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (100/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Tecno Pova 7 Neo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 560883 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3050 | 760 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9300 | 1890 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 1080x2460 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | — | |
| Weight | 309 g | 210 g | |
| Price | $2899 | $140 |
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Tecno Pova 7 Neo
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Pova 7 Neo
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Tecno Pova 7 Neo
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Tecno Pova 7 Neo, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Tecno Pova 7 Neo by 421.8% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $2759. Tecno Pova 7 Neo is cheaper by $2759.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Neo (67/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Neo (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (49/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Neo and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (56/100 vs 52/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Neo significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (37/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Neo significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (100/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Tecno Pova 7 Neo?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Neo by 27 points (57/100 vs 30/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Tecno Pova 7 Neo?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Tecno Pova 7 Neo — 30/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Tecno Pova 7 Neo?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (49/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Tecno Pova 7 Neo?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Tecno Pova 7 Neo?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users. The Tecno Pova 7 Neo is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.