Samsung Galaxy S26 vs Tecno Pova 7 Neo
The Samsung Galaxy S26 (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600, while the Tecno Pova 7 Neo (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate; launch prices were $799 and $140. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 leads — 75/100 vs 49/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova 7 Neo has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 is faster in AnTuTu (3,161,126 vs 575,630); the Samsung Galaxy S26 is noticeably lighter (162g vs 210g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S26
Tecno Pova 7 Neo
What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3161126 vs 575630
- Better Geekbench Single: 2880 vs 727
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9100 vs 2014
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 162g vs 210g
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 44/100)
- Better camera (77/100 vs 39/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 54/100)
- Better portability (89/100 vs 49/100)
What makes Tecno Pova 7 Neo better?
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Cheaper at launch: $140 vs $799
- Longer battery life (71/100 vs 31/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26 vs the Tecno Pova 7 Neo, the Samsung Galaxy S26 scores 26 points higher (75/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 leads (91/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 leads (77/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Neo leads (71/100 vs 31/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S26 — 64/100, Tecno Pova 7 Neo — 74/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Neo (91/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Neo (81/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Neo (77/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Neo significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (71/100 vs 31/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Neo (89/100 vs 49/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S26 | Tecno Pova 7 Neo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 2600 | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | 3161126 | 575630 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2880 | 727 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9100 | 2014 | |
| Display | 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1080x2460 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | — | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 146 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm | — | |
| Weight | 162 g | 210 g | |
| Launch price | $799 | $140 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S26
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 12MP
Tecno Pova 7 Neo
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S26
- 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Pova 7 Neo
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S26
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Tecno Pova 7 Neo
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy S26 and Tecno Pova 7 Neo, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S26 leads Tecno Pova 7 Neo by 449.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $659. Tecno Pova 7 Neo was $659 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Neo (91/100 vs 44/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Neo (81/100 vs 54/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Neo (77/100 vs 39/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Neo significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (71/100 vs 31/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Neo (89/100 vs 49/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26 or the Tecno Pova 7 Neo?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Neo by 26 points (75/100 vs 49/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26 and the Tecno Pova 7 Neo?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Tecno Pova 7 Neo — 49/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S26 or the Tecno Pova 7 Neo?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 leads on camera score (77/100 vs 39/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S26 or the Tecno Pova 7 Neo?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 leads on performance (91/100 vs 44/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26 over the Tecno Pova 7 Neo?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 is a better fit for gamers and power users.