Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (2024) and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 37/100 (a 20-point difference).
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Better camera (81/100 vs 49/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (55/100 vs 0/100)
- Higher performance (67/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 20 points higher (57/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (81/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (55/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (81/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (52/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | — | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 9300 | |
| Display | 6.7" OLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | — | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15, One UI 7 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | — | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | — | 309 g | |
| Price | — | $2899 |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- —
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (67/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (81/100 vs 49/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (52/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (50/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim by 20 points (57/100 vs 37/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim has a MobileRank rating of 37/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads on camera score (81/100 vs 49/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.