Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads — 58/100 vs 57/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 2,760,000); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is noticeably lighter (199g vs 309g).
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Lighter: 199g vs 309g
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (55/100 vs 0/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 2760000
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4800 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (67/100 vs 65/100)
- Better camera (49/100 vs 45/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 38/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide scores 1 points higher (58/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 38/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (55/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (67/100 vs 65/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (49/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 38/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (51/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2760000 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3050 | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9300 | 9300 | |
| Display | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2 | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1828x2584 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×123.9×4.9 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 309 g | |
| Price | — | $2899 |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
- Resolution: 1828x2584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide by 5.7% in our overall performance rating.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (67/100 vs 65/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (49/100 vs 45/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 38/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (51/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 57/100.
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.