Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 75/100 vs 58/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,515,964 vs 2,760,000); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is noticeably lighter (199g vs 214g).
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Higher AnTuTu: 3515964 vs 2760000
- Better Geekbench Single: 3601 vs 3050
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10686 vs 9300
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 60W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (84/100 vs 65/100)
- Better camera (86/100 vs 45/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 38/100)
- Lighter: 199g vs 214g
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 32/100)
- Better value for money (55/100 vs 20/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 17 points higher (75/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (84/100 vs 65/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (51/100 vs 38/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (55/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (84/100 vs 65/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (86/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (51/100 vs 38/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (51/100 vs 32/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (55/100 vs 20/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3515964 | 2760000 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3601 | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10686 | 9300 | |
| Display | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2 | |
| Resolution | 3120x1440 | 1828x2584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 60W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 25W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 157 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm | 161.4×123.9×4.9 mm | |
| Weight | 214 g | 199 g | |
| Price | $1299 | — |
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
- Resolution: 1828x2584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless: 25W
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide by 27.4% in our overall performance rating.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (84/100 vs 65/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (86/100 vs 45/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (51/100 vs 38/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (51/100 vs 32/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (55/100 vs 20/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — 58/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 45/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on performance (84/100 vs 65/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for active users.