Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $1299 and $1999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 75/100 vs 65/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 3,515,964).
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 60W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 25W vs 15W
- Lighter: 214g vs 215g
- Cheaper: $1299 vs $1999
- Better camera (86/100 vs 45/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 40/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (32/100 vs 31/100)
- Better value for money (20/100 vs 0/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 3515964
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3601
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 10686
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 84/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 10 points higher (75/100 vs 65/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (51/100 vs 40/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (20/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is a bit better (92/100 vs 84/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (86/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (51/100 vs 40/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 are nearly equal (32/100 vs 31/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (20/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3515964 | 3942923 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3601 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10686 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 3120x1440 | 1968x2184 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 60W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 25W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 157 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm | — | |
| Weight | 214 g | 215 g | |
| Price | $1299 | $1999 |
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1968x2184
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless: 25W
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 leads Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra by 10.8% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $700. Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is cheaper by $700.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is a bit better (92/100 vs 84/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (86/100 vs 45/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (51/100 vs 40/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 are nearly equal (32/100 vs 31/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (20/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 — 65/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 45/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 leads on performance (92/100 vs 84/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is a better fit for gamers and power users.