Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs Vivo iQOO 13
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (2020) runs on the Samsung Exynos 990, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1299 and $650. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 57/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,150,555 vs 918,508).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
Vivo iQOO 13
What makes Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra better?
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Overall rating 57/100
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3150555 vs 918508
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1222
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3060
- Bigger battery: 6150 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 207g vs 208g
- Cheaper at launch: $650 vs $1299
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 49/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 42/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 88/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 53/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 27 points higher (84/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (91/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 42/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra — 24/100, Vivo iQOO 13 — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (91/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (99/100 vs 88/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (78/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (73/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 and the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra are nearly equal (55/100 vs 53/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo iQOO 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 990 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 918508 | 3150555 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1222 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3060 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.9" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3088x1440 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.8×77.2×8.1 mm | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 208 g | 207 g | |
| Launch price | $1299 | $650 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- 6.9" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3088x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 13 leads Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra by 70.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $649. Vivo iQOO 13 was $649 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (91/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (99/100 vs 88/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (78/100 vs 49/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (73/100 vs 42/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 and the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra are nearly equal (55/100 vs 53/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra by 27 points (84/100 vs 57/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 49/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (91/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra over the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.