Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (2020) runs on the Samsung Exynos 990, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $1299 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 87/100 vs 32/100 (a 55-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 918,508); the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is noticeably lighter (208g vs 230g).
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 208g vs 230g
- Better design/ergonomics (40/100 vs 12/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 918508
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1222
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 3060
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Cheaper: $950 vs $1299
- Higher performance (96/100 vs 5/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 45/100)
- Longer battery life (77/100 vs 27/100)
- Better value for money (44/100 vs 20/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 55 points higher (87/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 5/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (77/100 vs 27/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (44/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (96/100 vs 5/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (96/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (77/100 vs 27/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (40/100 vs 12/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (44/100 vs 20/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 990 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 918508 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1222 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3060 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.9" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 3088x1440 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 164.8×77.2×8.1 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 208 g | 230 g | |
| Price | $1299 | $950 |
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- 6.9" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3088x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra by 78.4% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $349. Vivo X300 Ultra is cheaper by $349.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (96/100 vs 5/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (96/100 vs 45/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (77/100 vs 27/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (40/100 vs 12/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (44/100 vs 20/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra by 55 points (87/100 vs 32/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 45/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 5/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.