Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs Vivo iQOO 15
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (2020) runs on the Samsung Exynos 990, while the Vivo iQOO 15 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1299 and $599. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads — 86/100 vs 57/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 is faster in AnTuTu (3,740,528 vs 918,508).
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
Vivo iQOO 15
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 208g vs 215g
- Better portability (53/100 vs 48/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3740528 vs 918508
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1222
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 3060
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $1299
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 49/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 42/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 88/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs the Vivo iQOO 15, the Vivo iQOO 15 scores 29 points higher (86/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (94/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (78/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (85/100 vs 42/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra — 22/100, Vivo iQOO 15 — 84/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (94/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 is a bit better (99/100 vs 88/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (78/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (85/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a bit better (53/100 vs 48/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo iQOO 15 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 990 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 918508 | 3740528 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1222 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3060 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.9" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3088x1440 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.8×77.2×8.1 mm | 163.7×76.8×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 208 g | 215 g | |
| Launch price | $1299 | $599 |
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo iQOO 15
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- 6.9" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3088x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 15
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo iQOO 15
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 18:52 hrs, total 39:26 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and Vivo iQOO 15, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 15 leads Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra by 75.4% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $700. Vivo iQOO 15 was $700 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (94/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 is a bit better (99/100 vs 88/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (78/100 vs 49/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (85/100 vs 42/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a bit better (53/100 vs 48/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO 15?
The Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra by 29 points (86/100 vs 57/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and the Vivo iQOO 15?
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO 15?
The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 49/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO 15?
The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on performance (94/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra over the Vivo iQOO 15?
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.