Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs Vivo iQOO 15

The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (2020) runs on the Samsung Exynos 990, while the Vivo iQOO 15 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1299 and $599. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads — 86/100 vs 57/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 is faster in AnTuTu (3,758,268 vs 918,508).

The Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra by 29 points (86/100 vs 57/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra

Performance 58
Display 88
Camera 49
Battery 42
Portability 53
Value for money 24

Vivo iQOO 15

Performance 94
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 85
Portability 48
Value for money 86

What makes Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra better?

  • Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 208g vs 215g

  • Better portability (53/100 vs 48/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 15 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3758268 vs 918508
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1222
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3060
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
  • Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $1299

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 58/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 49/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 88/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs the Vivo iQOO 15, the Vivo iQOO 15 scores 29 points higher (86/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (94/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (78/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (85/100 vs 42/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra — 24/100, Vivo iQOO 15 — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (94/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 is a bit better (99/100 vs 88/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (78/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (85/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a bit better (53/100 vs 48/100).

Vivo iQOO 15: The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra Vivo iQOO 15
Processor Samsung Exynos 990 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 918508 3758268
Geekbench Single 1222 3013
Geekbench Multi 3060 9287
Display 6.9" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 3088x1440 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4500 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 25W 100W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
Main camera 108 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 12 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 10 Android 16
Brightness (peak) — 6000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 164.8×77.2×8.1 mm 163.7×76.8×8.1 mm
Weight 208 g 215 g
Launch price $1299 $599

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra

  • Main: 108MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
49
camera

Vivo iQOO 15

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra

  • 6.9" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3088x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display

Vivo iQOO 15

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra

  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
42
battery

Vivo iQOO 15

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 18:52 hrs, total 39:26 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and Vivo iQOO 15, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990
57/100
918508 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
86/100 +75.6%
3758268 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 leads Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra by 75.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra

$1299

Vivo iQOO 15

$599

Launch price difference: $700. Vivo iQOO 15 was $700 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (94/100 vs 58/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 is a bit better (99/100 vs 88/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (78/100 vs 49/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (85/100 vs 42/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a bit better (53/100 vs 48/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra by 29 points (86/100 vs 57/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 — 86/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 49/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on performance (94/100 vs 58/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra over the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.