Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs Vivo X300s
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (2020) runs on the Samsung Exynos 990, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $1299 and $723. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 57/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 918,508).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
Vivo X300s
What makes Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra better?
- Lighter: 208g vs 217g
- Better portability (53/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo X300s better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 918508
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1222
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 3060
- Bigger battery: 7100 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Cheaper at launch: $723 vs $1299
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 49/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 42/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 88/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 32 points higher (89/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s leads (95/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 42/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra — 24/100, Vivo X300s — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (95/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 88/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (94/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (83/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a bit better (53/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 990 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 918508 | 3703823 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1222 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3060 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.9" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3088x1440 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 7100 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 164.8×77.2×8.1 mm | — | |
| Weight | 208 g | 217 g | |
| Launch price | $1299 | $723 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X300s
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- 6.9" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3088x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300s
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300s
- 7100 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300s leads Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra by 75.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $576. Vivo X300s was $576 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (95/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 88/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (94/100 vs 49/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (83/100 vs 42/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a bit better (53/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra by 32 points (89/100 vs 57/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and the Vivo X300s?
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 49/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s leads on performance (95/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra over the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.