Samsung Galaxy M14 5G vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (2023) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $179 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 44/100 (a 43-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 607,137); the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G is noticeably lighter (206g vs 226g).
Samsung Galaxy M14 5G
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 206g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $179 vs $899
- Overall rating 44/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 607137
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 952
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 1963
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 47/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 54/100)
- Better portability (43/100 vs 40/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 43 points higher (87/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 47/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 51/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy M14 5G — 56/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (93/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (84/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (96/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (81/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G are nearly equal (43/100 vs 40/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M14 5G | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 1330 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 607137 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 952 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1963 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2408x1080 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 166.8×77.2×9.4 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 206 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $179 | $899 |
Samsung Galaxy M14 5G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy M14 5G
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 2408x1080
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M14 5G
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy M14 5G and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy M14 5G by 81.4% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $720. Samsung Galaxy M14 5G was $720 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (93/100 vs 47/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (84/100 vs 54/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (96/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (81/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G are nearly equal (43/100 vs 40/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G by 43 points (87/100 vs 44/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy M14 5G has a MobileRank rating of 44/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 47/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy M14 5G is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.