Samsung Galaxy M14 5G vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (2023) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $179 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 44/100 (a 47-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 607,137); the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G is noticeably lighter (206g vs 230g).
Samsung Galaxy M14 5G
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 206g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $179 vs $950
- Better portability (40/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 607137
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 952
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1963
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 47/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 54/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 47 points higher (91/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 47/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 51/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy M14 5G — 56/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (99/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (89/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (96/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (85/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (40/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M14 5G | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 1330 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 607137 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 952 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1963 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2408x1080 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 166.8×77.2×9.4 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 206 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $179 | $950 |
Samsung Galaxy M14 5G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy M14 5G
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 2408x1080
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M14 5G
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy M14 5G and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy M14 5G by 85.7% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $771. Samsung Galaxy M14 5G was $771 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (99/100 vs 47/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (89/100 vs 54/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (96/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (85/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (40/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G by 47 points (91/100 vs 44/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy M14 5G has a MobileRank rating of 44/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 47/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy M14 5G is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.