Samsung Galaxy M14 5G vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

The Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (2023) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $179 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 44/100 (a 45-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 6000); the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 607,489); the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G is noticeably lighter (206g vs 227g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G by 45 points (89/100 vs 44/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy M14 5G

Performance 46
Display 54
Camera 31
Battery 52
Portability 40
Value for money 54

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 92
Portability 35
Value for money 92

What makes Samsung Galaxy M14 5G better?

  • Lighter: 206g vs 227g
  • Cheaper at launch: $179 vs $799

  • Better portability (40/100 vs 35/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 607489
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 960
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 1826
  • Bigger battery: 7400 vs 6000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 46/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 31/100)
  • Longer battery life (92/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 54/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 45 points higher (89/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 52/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy M14 5G — 54/100, Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (99/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (99/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (78/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (92/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G is a bit better (40/100 vs 35/100).

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy M14 5G Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Processor Samsung Exynos 1330 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 607489 4602290
Geekbench Single 960 3639
Geekbench Multi 1826 11047
Display 6.6" IPS LCD 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2408x1080 1440x3168
Refresh rate 90 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 7400 mAh
Charging 25W 120W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB 12GB / 16GB / 24GB
Storage 64GB / 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 13 Android 16
Brightness (peak) — 8000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection — IP68
Dimensions 166.8×77.2×9.4 mm 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm
Weight 206 g 227 g
Launch price $179 $799

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy M14 5G

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 13MP
31
camera

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy M14 5G

  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 2408x1080
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
54
display

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy M14 5G

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
52
battery

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 7400 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
92
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy M14 5G and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy M14 5G Samsung Exynos 1330
44/100
607489 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100 +86.8%
4602290 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy M14 5G by 86.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy M14 5G

$179

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

$799

Launch price difference: $620. Samsung Galaxy M14 5G was $620 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (99/100 vs 46/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (99/100 vs 54/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (78/100 vs 31/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (92/100 vs 52/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G is a bit better (40/100 vs 35/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G by 45 points (89/100 vs 44/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy M14 5G has a MobileRank rating of 44/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 31/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 46/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.