Samsung Galaxy M14 5G vs Vivo X Fold6

The Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (2023) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330, while the Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $179 and $1900. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 44/100 (a 44-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold6 has the bigger battery (6900 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X Fold6 is faster in AnTuTu (3,485,039 vs 607,137); the Vivo X Fold6 is thinner (4.3mm vs 9.4mm).

The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G by 44 points (88/100 vs 44/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy M14 5G
Performance 47
Display 54
Camera 31
Battery 51
Portability 40
Value for money 56
Vivo X Fold6
Performance 94
Display 81
Camera 87
Battery 82
Portability 100
Value for money 80
What makes Samsung Galaxy M14 5G better?
  • Cheaper at launch: $179 vs $1900

  • Overall rating 44/100
What makes Vivo X Fold6 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3485039 vs 607137
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 952
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 1963
  • Bigger battery: 6900 vs 6000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 15W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 47/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 31/100)
  • Longer battery life (82/100 vs 51/100)
  • Better display (81/100 vs 54/100)
  • Better portability (100/100 vs 40/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G vs the Vivo X Fold6, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 44 points higher (88/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (94/100 vs 47/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (87/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (82/100 vs 51/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy M14 5G — 56/100, Vivo X Fold6 — 80/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (94/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (81/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (87/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (82/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (100/100 vs 40/100).

Samsung Galaxy M14 5G: The Samsung Galaxy M14 5G is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X Fold6: The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy M14 5G Vivo X Fold6
Processor Samsung Exynos 1330 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 607137 3485039
Geekbench Single 952 3228
Geekbench Multi 1963 9553
Display 6.6" IPS LCD 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2408x1080 2480x2200
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 6900 mAh
Charging 15W 80W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 13 MP 20 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB 16GB
Storage 64GB / 128GB 512GB
OS Android 13 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 5500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 166.8×77.2×9.4 mm 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm
Weight 206 g
Launch price $179 $1900
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy M14 5G
  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 13MP
31
camera
Vivo X Fold6
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.75
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
87
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy M14 5G
  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 2408x1080
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
54
display
Vivo X Fold6
  • 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy M14 5G
  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 15W
  • No wireless charging
51
battery
Vivo X Fold6
  • 6900 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
82
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy M14 5G and Vivo X Fold6, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy M14 5G Samsung Exynos 1330
44/100
607137 AnTuTu
Vivo X Fold6 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
88/100 +82.6%
3485039 AnTuTu

Vivo X Fold6 leads Samsung Galaxy M14 5G by 82.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy M14 5G
$179
Vivo X Fold6
$1900

Launch price difference: $1721. Samsung Galaxy M14 5G was $1721 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (94/100 vs 47/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (81/100 vs 54/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (87/100 vs 31/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (82/100 vs 51/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (100/100 vs 40/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G by 44 points (88/100 vs 44/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G and the Vivo X Fold6?

The Samsung Galaxy M14 5G has a MobileRank rating of 44/100, the Vivo X Fold6 — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 31/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 leads on performance (94/100 vs 47/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G over the Vivo X Fold6?

The Samsung Galaxy M14 5G is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.