Poco C95 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Poco C95 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Helio G91 Ultra, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $253 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 38/100 (a 53-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C95 Pro has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 7000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 354,158).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco C95 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Poco C95 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 7500 vs 7000 mAh
- Cheaper at launch: $253 vs $950
- Overall rating 38/100
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 354158
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 405
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 1407
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 230g vs 232g
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 29/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 62/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 55/100)
- Better portability (39/100 vs 32/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco C95 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 53 points higher (91/100 vs 38/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 29/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 62/100). Value score: Poco C95 Pro — 26/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (99/100 vs 29/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (89/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (85/100 vs 62/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (39/100 vs 32/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco C95 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G91 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 354158 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 405 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1407 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.9" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7500 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 170.1×78.4×8.8 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 232 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $253 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Poco C95 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Poco C95 Pro
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco C95 Pro
- 7500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Poco C95 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Poco C95 Pro by 91.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $697. Poco C95 Pro was $697 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (99/100 vs 29/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (89/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (96/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (85/100 vs 62/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (39/100 vs 32/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco C95 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro by 53 points (91/100 vs 38/100).
What is the rating of the Poco C95 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Poco C95 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 38/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco C95 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco C95 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 29/100).
Should you choose the Poco C95 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.