Poco C95 Pro vs Vivo iQOO 16
The Poco C95 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Helio G91 Ultra, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6; launch prices were $253 and $840. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 38/100 (a 51-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 7500); the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 354,158).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco C95 Pro
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes Poco C95 Pro better?
- Cheaper at launch: $253 vs $840
- Overall rating 38/100
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 354158
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 405
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 1407
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 7500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 223g vs 232g
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 29/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 62/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 55/100)
- Better portability (42/100 vs 32/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco C95 Pro vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 51 points higher (89/100 vs 38/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 29/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 62/100). Value score: Poco C95 Pro — 26/100, Vivo iQOO 16 — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (100/100 vs 29/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (90/100 vs 62/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (42/100 vs 32/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco C95 Pro | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G91 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | 354158 | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 405 | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1407 | 12873 | |
| Display | 6.9" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 7500 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 170.1×78.4×8.8 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 232 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | $253 | $840 |
Camera comparison
Poco C95 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Poco C95 Pro
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco C95 Pro
- 7500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Poco C95 Pro and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads Poco C95 Pro by 93.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $587. Poco C95 Pro was $587 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (100/100 vs 29/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (99/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (78/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (90/100 vs 62/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (42/100 vs 32/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco C95 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro by 51 points (89/100 vs 38/100).
What is the rating of the Poco C95 Pro and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Poco C95 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 38/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco C95 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco C95 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 29/100).
Should you choose the Poco C95 Pro over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.