Poco C95 Pro vs Vivo X500

The Poco C95 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Helio G91 Ultra, while the Vivo X500 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9600M; launch prices were $253 and $820. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X500 leads — 89/100 vs 38/100 (a 51-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X500 is faster in AnTuTu (3,930,719 vs 354,158); the Vivo X500 is noticeably lighter (211g vs 232g).

The Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro by 51 points (89/100 vs 38/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Poco C95 Pro

Performance 29
Display 55
Camera 30
Battery 62
Portability 32
Value for money 26

Vivo X500

Performance 96
Display 94
Camera 87
Battery 84
Portability 50
Value for money 92

What makes Poco C95 Pro better?

  • Cheaper at launch: $253 vs $820

  • Overall rating 38/100

What makes Vivo X500 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3930719 vs 354158
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3302 vs 405
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10240 vs 1407
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 211g vs 232g

  • Higher performance (96/100 vs 29/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (84/100 vs 62/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better portability (50/100 vs 32/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Poco C95 Pro vs the Vivo X500, the Vivo X500 scores 51 points higher (89/100 vs 38/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 leads (96/100 vs 29/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 leads (87/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 leads (84/100 vs 62/100). Value score: Poco C95 Pro — 26/100, Vivo X500 — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (96/100 vs 29/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (94/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (87/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 notably outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (84/100 vs 62/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X500 notably outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (50/100 vs 32/100).

Vivo X500: The Vivo X500 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Poco C95 Pro Vivo X500
Processor MediaTek Helio G91 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9600M
AnTuTu 354158 3930719
Geekbench Single 405 3302
Geekbench Multi 1407 10240
Display 6.9" IPS LCD 6.6" AMOLED
Resolution 720x1600 1260x2750
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 7500 mAh 7500 mAh
Charging 45W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 64 MP
Front camera 8 MP 50 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 17
Brightness (peak) — 4000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP64 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 170.1×78.4×8.8 mm 157.0×75.0×8.2 mm
Weight 232 g 211 g
Launch price $253 $820

Camera comparison

Poco C95 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Vivo X500

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera

Display comparison

Poco C95 Pro

  • 6.9" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
55
display

Vivo X500

  • 6.6" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2750
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Poco C95 Pro

  • 7500 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
62
battery

Vivo X500

  • 7500 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
84
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Poco C95 Pro and Vivo X500, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Poco C95 Pro MediaTek Helio G91 Ultra
38/100
354158 AnTuTu
Vivo X500 MediaTek Dimensity 9600M
89/100 +91.0%
3930719 AnTuTu

Vivo X500 leads Poco C95 Pro by 91.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Poco C95 Pro

$253

Vivo X500

$820

Launch price difference: $567. Poco C95 Pro was $567 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (96/100 vs 29/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (94/100 vs 55/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (87/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 notably outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (84/100 vs 62/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X500 notably outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (50/100 vs 32/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Poco C95 Pro or the Vivo X500?

The Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro by 51 points (89/100 vs 38/100).

What is the rating of the Poco C95 Pro and the Vivo X500?

The Poco C95 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 38/100, the Vivo X500 — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Poco C95 Pro or the Vivo X500?

The Vivo X500 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Poco C95 Pro or the Vivo X500?

The Vivo X500 leads on performance (96/100 vs 29/100).

Should you choose the Poco C95 Pro over the Vivo X500?

The Vivo X500 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.