Poco C85 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Poco C85 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $100 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 36/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5160); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 348,562); the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has NFC for contactless payments, the Poco C85 doesn't; the Poco C85 is noticeably lighter (195g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco C85
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Poco C85 better?
- Lighter: 195g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $100 vs $2899
- Better portability (62/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 348562
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 419
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 1461
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5160 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 29/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 49/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 43/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco C85 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 33 points higher (69/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 29/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 49/100). Value score: Poco C85 — 60/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Poco C85 (90/100 vs 29/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Poco C85 (70/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Poco C85 (52/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco C85 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (62/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco C85 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G85 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 348562 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 419 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1461 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HyperOS 2 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 810 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 173.2×81.1×8.0 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $100 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Poco C85
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Poco C85
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco C85
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Poco C85 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Poco C85 by 88.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2799. Poco C85 was $2799 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Poco C85 (90/100 vs 29/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Poco C85 (70/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Poco C85 (52/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 49/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco C85 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (62/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco C85 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Poco C85 by 33 points (69/100 vs 36/100).
What is the rating of the Poco C85 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Poco C85 has a MobileRank rating of 36/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco C85 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco C85 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 29/100).
Should you choose the Poco C85 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.