OPPO Reno16 Pro vs Samsung W22 5G
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super, while the Samsung W22 5G (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads — 83/100 vs 48/100 (a 35-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 200 MP vs 12 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 1,135,878); the OPPO Reno16 Pro is noticeably lighter (188g vs 271g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro
Samsung W22 5G
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 1135878
- Better Geekbench Single: 1555 vs 1500
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6405 vs 3537
- Bigger battery: 6700 vs 4400 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 188g vs 271g
- Higher performance (82/100 vs 64/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 21/100)
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 38/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung W22 5G better?
- Overall rating 48/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro vs the Samsung W22 5G, the OPPO Reno16 Pro scores 35 points higher (83/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (82/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 21/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (66/100 vs 38/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (82/100 vs 64/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (95/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (94/100 vs 21/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (66/100 vs 38/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (64/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro | Samsung W22 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 1135878 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 1500 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 3537 | |
| Display | 6.3" AMOLED | 6.2" Super Amoled | |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 | 832x2268 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6700 mAh | 4400 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 15W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 12 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | — | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 16GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IPX8 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 158.2×67.1×14.4 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 271 g | |
| Launch price | $600 | — |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung W22 5G
- Main: 12MP
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung W22 5G
- 6.2" Super Amoled
- Resolution: 832x2268
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Samsung W22 5G
- 4400 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro and Samsung W22 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno16 Pro leads Samsung W22 5G by 171.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung W22 5G
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (82/100 vs 64/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (95/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (94/100 vs 21/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (66/100 vs 38/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G (64/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Samsung W22 5G?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung W22 5G by 35 points (83/100 vs 48/100).
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro and the Samsung W22 5G?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Samsung W22 5G — 48/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Samsung W22 5G?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 21/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Samsung W22 5G?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on performance (82/100 vs 64/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro over the Samsung W22 5G?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung W22 5G is a better fit for active users.