OPPO Reno16 Pro vs Vivo X Fold6
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super, while the Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $600 and $1900. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 83/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold6 has the bigger battery (6900 mAh vs 6700); the Vivo X Fold6 is faster in AnTuTu (3,455,738 vs 3,079,298); the Vivo X Fold6 is thinner (4.3mm vs 8.2mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro
Vivo X Fold6
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Cheaper at launch: $600 vs $1900
- Better camera (94/100 vs 87/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 81/100)
What makes Vivo X Fold6 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3455738 vs 3079298
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 6405
- Bigger battery: 6900 vs 6700 mAh
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 82/100)
- Longer battery life (82/100 vs 66/100)
- Better portability (100/100 vs 64/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro vs the Vivo X Fold6, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 5 points higher (88/100 vs 83/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (95/100 vs 82/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (82/100 vs 66/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro — 80/100, Vivo X Fold6 — 84/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 is a bit better (95/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 87/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 Pro (82/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno16 Pro (100/100 vs 64/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro | Vivo X Fold6 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 3455738 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.3" AMOLED | 8.0" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6700 mAh | 6900 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 5500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | — | |
| Launch price | $600 | $1900 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X Fold6
- Main: 200MP f/1.75
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X Fold6
- 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X Fold6
- 6900 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro and Vivo X Fold6, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X Fold6 leads OPPO Reno16 Pro by 10.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1300. OPPO Reno16 Pro was $1300 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 is a bit better (95/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 87/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 Pro (82/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno16 Pro (100/100 vs 64/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 edges out the OPPO Reno16 Pro by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro and the Vivo X Fold6?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Vivo X Fold6 — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Vivo X Fold6?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 87/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 leads on performance (95/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro over the Vivo X Fold6?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.