OPPO Reno16 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; launch prices were $600 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads — 83/100 vs 64/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 3700); the main camera is 200 MP vs 12 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 1,746,199); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 is thinner (6.9mm vs 8.2mm).

The OPPO Reno16 Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 — the overall rating gap is 19 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

OPPO Reno16 Pro

Performance 82
Display 95
Camera 94
Battery 66
Portability 64
Value for money 80

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5

Performance 75
Display 82
Camera 63
Battery 24
Portability 78
Value for money 38

What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 1746199
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 6405 vs 5311
  • Bigger battery: 6700 vs 3700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Cheaper at launch: $600 vs $999

  • Higher performance (82/100 vs 75/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 63/100)
  • Longer battery life (66/100 vs 24/100)
  • Better display (95/100 vs 82/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 better?

  • Better Geekbench Single: 2004 vs 1555
  • Lighter: 187g vs 188g

  • Better portability (78/100 vs 64/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5, the OPPO Reno16 Pro scores 19 points higher (83/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 63/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (66/100 vs 24/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro — 80/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 — 38/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (82/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (94/100 vs 63/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (66/100 vs 24/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 is a bit better (78/100 vs 64/100).

OPPO Reno16 Pro: The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5: The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification OPPO Reno16 Pro Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
AnTuTu 3079298 1746199
Geekbench Single 1555 2004
Geekbench Multi 6405 5311
Display 6.3" AMOLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 1216x2640 2640x1080
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6700 mAh 3700 mAh
Charging 80W 25W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
DXOMark (camera) — 127
Main camera 200 MP 12 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 50 MP 10 MP
RAM 12GB 8GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 13
Brightness (peak) 3600 nits 1750 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69 IPX8
Dimensions 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm 165.1×71.9×6.9 mm
Weight 188 g 187 g
Launch price $600 $999

Camera comparison

OPPO Reno16 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5

  • Main: 12MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
63
camera

Display comparison

OPPO Reno16 Pro

  • 6.3" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1216x2640
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
95
display

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2640x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display

Battery and charging

OPPO Reno16 Pro

  • 6700 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
66
battery

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5

  • 3700 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
24
battery

Overall performance score

We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OPPO Reno16 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super
83/100
3079298 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
64/100 -76.3%
1746199 AnTuTu

OPPO Reno16 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 by 76.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

OPPO Reno16 Pro

$600

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5

$999

Launch price difference: $399. OPPO Reno16 Pro was $399 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (82/100 vs 75/100).

display

In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 82/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (94/100 vs 63/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (66/100 vs 24/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 is a bit better (78/100 vs 64/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 — the overall rating gap is 19 points.

What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 — 64/100.

Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 63/100).

Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on performance (82/100 vs 75/100).

Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 is a better fit for active users.