OPPO Find X9 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5

The OPPO Find X9 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; launch prices were $999 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Find X9 leads — 83/100 vs 64/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Find X9 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 3700); the main camera is 50 MP vs 12 MP; the OPPO Find X9 is faster in AnTuTu (3,400,423 vs 1,743,099); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 is noticeably lighter (187g vs 207g).

The OPPO Find X9 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Find X9
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 78
Battery 78
Portability 55
Value for money 78
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
Performance 75
Display 82
Camera 63
Battery 24
Portability 78
Value for money 40
What makes OPPO Find X9 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3400423 vs 1743099
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 2004
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 5311
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 3700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 75/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 63/100)
  • Longer battery life (78/100 vs 24/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 82/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 better?
  • Lighter: 187g vs 207g

  • Better portability (78/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the OPPO Find X9 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5, the OPPO Find X9 scores 19 points higher (83/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X9 leads (93/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X9 leads (78/100 vs 63/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X9 leads (78/100 vs 24/100). Value score: OPPO Find X9 — 78/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 — 40/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X9 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (93/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Find X9 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X9 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (78/100 vs 63/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X9 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (78/100 vs 24/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 notably outperforms the OPPO Find X9 (78/100 vs 55/100).

OPPO Find X9: The OPPO Find X9 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5: The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification OPPO Find X9 Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
AnTuTu 3400423 1743099
Geekbench Single 3228 2004
Geekbench Multi 9553 5311
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 2780x1264 2640x1080
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 3700 mAh
Charging 80W 25W
Wireless charging 50W 15W
DXOMark (camera) 127
Main camera 50 MP 12 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 10 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 8GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 Android 13
Brightness (peak) 3600 nits 1750 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IPX8
Dimensions 157.0×73.9×8.0 mm 165.1×71.9×6.9 mm
Weight 207 g 187 g
Launch price $999 $999
Camera comparison
OPPO Find X9
  • Main: 50MP f/1.4
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
  • Main: 12MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
63
camera
Display comparison
OPPO Find X9
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2780x1264
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2640x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display
Battery and charging
OPPO Find X9
  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
78
battery
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
  • 3700 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
24
battery
Overall performance score

We compared OPPO Find X9 and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OPPO Find X9 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
83/100
3400423 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
64/100 -95.1%
1743099 AnTuTu

OPPO Find X9 leads Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 by 95.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
OPPO Find X9
$999
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
$999

Launch price difference: $0. Same launch price.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X9 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (93/100 vs 75/100).

display

In the "display" category, the OPPO Find X9 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X9 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (78/100 vs 63/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X9 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (78/100 vs 24/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 notably outperforms the OPPO Find X9 (78/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Find X9 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5?

The OPPO Find X9 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 — the overall rating gap is 19 points.

What is the rating of the OPPO Find X9 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5?

The OPPO Find X9 has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 — 64/100.

Which has the better camera: the OPPO Find X9 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5?

The OPPO Find X9 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 63/100).

Which is more powerful: the OPPO Find X9 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5?

The OPPO Find X9 leads on performance (93/100 vs 75/100).

Should you choose the OPPO Find X9 over the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5?

The OPPO Find X9 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 is a better fit for active users.