OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (2020) runs on the Samsung Exynos 990; estimated prices are $661 and $1399. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 64/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 108 MP; the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 901,346).
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 901346
- Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 1222
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 3060
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Cheaper: $661 vs $1399
- Higher performance (89/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 73/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 56/100)
- Better portability (54/100 vs 37/100)
- Better value for money (84/100 vs 34/100)
- Better display (88/100 vs 84/100)
Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 22 points higher (86/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (89/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 73/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 56/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (84/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (89/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (88/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (94/100 vs 73/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (83/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (54/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (84/100 vs 34/100).
| Specification | OPPO Reno 16 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Samsung Exynos 990 | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 901346 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2680 | 1222 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8358 | 3060 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 48 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 40 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 10 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | — | 222 g | |
| Price | $661 | $1399 |
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 48MP
- Front: 40MP
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared OPPO Reno 16 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra by 241.6% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $738. OPPO Reno 16 Pro is cheaper by $738.
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (89/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (88/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (94/100 vs 73/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (83/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (54/100 vs 37/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (84/100 vs 34/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra by 22 points (86/100 vs 64/100).
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra — 64/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 73/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on performance (89/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is a better fit for everyday use.