Apple iPhone Fold vs OPPO Reno 16 Pro
The Apple iPhone Fold (2026) runs on the Apple A19 Pro, while the OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 77/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 2,568,709).
Apple iPhone Fold
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Better Geekbench Single: 3970 vs 2680
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10558 vs 8358
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 89/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 2568709
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Better camera (94/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 82/100)
Comparing the Apple iPhone Fold vs the OPPO Reno 16 Pro, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 9 points higher (86/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Fold and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Apple iPhone Fold are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone Fold (94/100 vs 53/100).
| Specification | Apple iPhone Fold | OPPO Reno 16 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A19 Pro | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | |
| AnTuTu | 2568709 | 3079298 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3970 | 2680 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10558 | 8358 | |
| Display | 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1920x2713 | 2772x1272 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | — | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 50W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 4 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | iOS 19 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | — | — | |
| Price | — | $661 |
Apple iPhone Fold
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 4MP
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Apple iPhone Fold
- 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1920x2713
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Apple iPhone Fold
- —
- Wireless charging: no data
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Apple iPhone Fold and OPPO Reno 16 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads Apple iPhone Fold by 16.6% in our overall performance rating.
Apple iPhone Fold
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Fold and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Apple iPhone Fold are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone Fold (94/100 vs 53/100).
Which is better: the Apple iPhone Fold or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro edges out the Apple iPhone Fold by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone Fold and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The Apple iPhone Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone Fold or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 53/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone Fold over the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The Apple iPhone Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.