OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $661 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 86/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 3,079,298).
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Cheaper: $661 vs $950
- Better portability (54/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 3079298
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 2680
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 8358
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 89/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 94/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 83/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
- Better value for money (94/100 vs 84/100)
Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 5 points higher (91/100 vs 86/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 89/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (96/100 vs 94/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 83/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (54/100 vs 39/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).
| Specification | OPPO Reno 16 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2680 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8358 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | — | 230 g | |
| Price | $661 | $950 |
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared OPPO Reno 16 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads OPPO Reno 16 Pro by 27.5% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $289. OPPO Reno 16 Pro is cheaper by $289.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (96/100 vs 94/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 83/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (54/100 vs 39/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra edges out the OPPO Reno 16 Pro by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 89/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.